Skip to the record
The Executive Record

Not legal advice

The registerExecutive Order 14428
E.O.14428

Providing Meaningful Water Quality Improvements Through Collaboration and Oversight of Federal Support

Signed September 16, 2026·Donald Trump·91 FR 59975

Source

Everything on this page is drawn from the Federal Register, the official daily journal of the United States government. Where this page and the source disagree, the source governs.

Plain-language summary

Auto-generated summaryWritten by claude-sonnet-5 from the order’s own text · prompt v4 ·

Revokes Executive Order 13508 (Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration), citing progress in reducing pollution in the Chesapeake Bay and concerns that states and localities used that order to justify stormwater management fees, sometimes called "rain taxes," on residents and small businesses. Directs the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to review their agencies' support for Chesapeake Bay health and redirect funding toward direct, measurable water-quality projects in areas of highest need. Directs the Environmental Protection Agency to coordinate with Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, New York, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia to assess financial burdens from stormwater fees, identify alternatives that don't raise costs for residents, and encourage repeal of such fees. Requires that actions taken under the order be based on objective, scientifically documented performance metrics such as sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen reduction. States the order does not create enforceable rights and assigns publication costs to the Environmental Protection Agency.

Not written or reviewed by a person. Read the full order below for anything you intend to rely on.

Report a problem with this summary
What is wrong with it?
Goes to the site’s maintainers. Not published.

This space holds court challenges, injunctions and rulings tied to this order, each linked to the court record it comes from. It is empty on every order: an empty panel means this site publishes nothing here, not that nothing has happened to the order.

Nothing appears in this space without a citation to a court action. A ruling on a comparable order is shown as precedent — the record of what a court did there, not a signal about this order. An order with no court action of its own is described as untested, never as likely or unlikely to survive.

Claimed authority

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in furtherance of the purposes of the Clean Water Act of 1972, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), it is hereby ordered

Quoted from the order as written. Many orders cite nothing more specific than “the Constitution and the laws”; this reproduces what the order claims, not an assessment of whether it holds.

Disposition

Revokes: EO 13508, May 12, 2009

Compiled after the fact by the National Archives, so recent orders often have none yet. An empty disposition means no record, not no activity.

The order, in full

Executive Order 14428 of September 16, 2026

Providing Meaningful Water Quality Improvements
Through Collaboration and Oversight of Federal Support

By the authority vested in me as President by the
Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, and in furtherance of the purposes of the
Clean Water Act of 1972, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et
seq.), it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose and Policy. The Chesapeake Bay is
the largest estuary in the United States and serves a
critically important economic purpose to the
communities it directly and indirectly touches. In
managing the Chesapeake Bay, as with other resources,
governmental actors should prioritize environmental
protection and economic objectives. Executive Order
13508 of May 12, 2009 (Chesapeake Bay Protection and
Restoration), which has been in effect for 17 years,
instituted a broad mandate for States and
municipalities to contribute to improving the
environmental health of the Chesapeake Bay, without
providing clarity on how to implement that order's
requirements.

In some instances, this lack of clarity has led to
harmful economic impacts on affected Americans. For
example, many localities have implemented stormwater
management fees, commonly referred to as “rain
taxes,” that impose hundreds of dollars in annual
financial burdens on residents and small businesses in
the name of implementing Executive Order 13508, though
nothing in that order required or explicitly justified
such measures, with little to no measurable benefits to
Chesapeake Bay or to those residents. States use these
rain taxes to pay for their stormwater infrastructure,
whether or not it contributes to the environmental
health of the Chesapeake Bay.

Since Executive Order 13508 was signed, a number of
other Federal, State, and local government initiatives
and programs have resulted in significant improvements
in water quality in the Chesapeake Bay. As of 2025, the
jurisdictions of the Chesapeake Bay watershed--New
York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, the District of
Columbia, Delaware, and West Virginia--have
collectively met 100 percent of their goal for sediment
reduction, 90 percent of their goal for phosphorus
reduction, and 57 percent of their goal for nitrogen
reduction. These pollution reductions are improving
Chesapeake Bay health and have resulted in thousands of
acres of restored reefs and remain consistent with
commitments made in the 2025 revised Chesapeake Bay
Watershed Agreement, to which the Federal Government
and the executive departments and agencies (agencies)
mentioned in section 3 of this order are signatories.
In 2026, scientists from the College of William & Mary,
the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, FlowWest, and
the University of Maryland Center for Environmental
Science reported that the Chesapeake Bay's annual dead
zone is projected to be among the smallest since 1985,
about 31 percent below the long-term average.

Given this significant progress, and the need to
provide clarity on how to continue improving the
environmental health of the Chesapeake Bay, it is
appropriate to revoke Executive Order 13508, which
relevant jurisdictions have erroneously relied on to
impose rain taxes, and to implement new actions and
best practices that promote the economic health and
wellbeing of the communities the Chesapeake Bay serves.

Sec. 2. Revocation of Order. Executive Order 13508 is
hereby revoked.

Sec. 3. Prioritization of Programs Directly Benefiting
and Protecting Bay Health. (a) The Secretary of War,
the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of
Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary
of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency shall assess the
current support that their respective agencies provide
for the health of the Chesapeake Bay and focus any
resources--fiscal or personnel--on more direct, on-the-
ground projects, in areas of highest need, that would
result in the most impactful water quality
improvements. All agencies that provide funding to
support the health of the Chesapeake Bay shall
prioritize funding in a manner that addresses water
quality goals directly, redirecting funding away from
activities that do not generate measurable progress
towards stated goals, to implementation of projects
that will directly reduce nutrient and sediment run-off
into the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.

    (b) The Environmental Protection Agency shall
coordinate with the States of Maryland, Virginia,
Pennsylvania, Delaware, New York, and West Virginia,
and the District of Columbia, to:

(i) assess the additional financial burdens placed on residents of these
jurisdictions through the imposition of stormwater management fees;

(ii) explore initiatives and opportunities to effectuate this order and
promote the environmental health of the Chesapeake Bay that do not increase
costs on individual residents of these jurisdictions; and

(iii) take measures to encourage the repeal or rescission of stormwater
management fees imposed by States or localities and funded by their
respective residents.

    (c) Actions taken pursuant to this section shall
prioritize strategies that are grounded in objective
metrics and proven water management practices,
supported by empirical data and scientific analysis,
and measurable in impact. Strategies shall use and
rigorously document performance indicators and
outcomes, such as reductions in sediment, phosphorus,
and nitrogen loads, and improvements in water quality.

Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order
shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or
the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget
relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with
applicable law and subject to the availability of
appropriations.

    (c) This order is not intended to, and does not,
create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural,
enforceable at law or in equity by any party against
the United States, its departments, agencies, or
entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any
other person.
    (d) The costs of publication of this order shall be
borne by the Environmental Protection Agency.

    (Presidential Sig.)

THE WHITE HOUSE,

    September 16, 2026.

Reproduced from the Federal Register plain-text record, signed September 16, 2026. Typesetting artifacts are removed; no wording is changed.