Skip to the record
The Executive Record

Not legal advice

The registerExecutive Order 13893
E.O.13893

Increasing Government Accountability for Administrative Actions by Reinvigorating Administrative PAYGO

Signed October 10, 2019·Donald Trump·84 FR 55487

Source

Everything on this page is drawn from the Federal Register, the official daily journal of the United States government. Where this page and the source disagree, the source governs.

Plain-language summary

Auto-generated summaryWritten by claude-sonnet-5 from the order’s own text · prompt v4 ·

Establishes a policy requiring executive agencies to offset increases in mandatory federal spending caused by discretionary administrative actions, such as rules, demonstrations, program notices, or guidance not required by statute. Before undertaking such an action, an agency head must submit it to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget with an estimate of its budgetary effects, and if the action would increase mandatory spending, propose other actions to comparably reduce it; submissions without offsets are to be returned for reconsideration. If an agency believes an action is legally required and therefore exempt, its general counsel must give OMB a written legal opinion and consult with OMB. Within 90 days, the Director must issue implementation guidance and revoke a 2005 OMB memorandum on the same topic. The Director may waive these requirements or pursue additional deficit reduction through agency actions. The order does not create enforceable legal rights and applies within existing law and available appropriations.

Not written or reviewed by a person. Read the full order below for anything you intend to rely on.

Report a problem with this summary
What is wrong with it?
Goes to the site’s maintainers. Not published.

Not yet published. Court challenges, injunctions and rulings tied to individual orders will appear here once each can be linked to its source record.

Nothing appears in this space without a citation to a court action or a cited precedent. An order with no such record is described as untested, never as likely or unlikely to survive.

Claimed authority

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered

Quoted from the order as written. Many orders cite nothing more specific than “the Constitution and the laws”; this reproduces what the order claims, not an assessment of whether it holds.

Disposition

Revoked by: EO 13992, January 20, 2021

Compiled after the fact by the National Archives, so recent orders often have none yet. An empty disposition means no record, not no activity.

The order, in full

Executive Order 13893 of October 10, 2019

Increasing Government Accountability for
Administrative Actions by Reinvigorating Administrative
PAYGO

By the authority vested in me as President by the
Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. In May 2005, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) implemented a budget-
neutrality requirement on executive branch
administrative actions affecting mandatory spending.
This mechanism, commonly referred to as
“Administrative pay-as-you-go” (Administrative
PAYGO), requires each executive department and agency
(agency) to include one or more proposals for reducing
mandatory spending whenever an agency proposes to
undertake a discretionary administrative action that
would increase mandatory spending.

In practice, however, agencies have applied this
requirement with varying degrees of stringency,
sometimes resulting in higher mandatory spending.
Accordingly, institutionalizing and reinvigorating
Administrative PAYGO through this order is a prudent
approach to keeping mandatory spending under control.

Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the executive
branch to control Federal spending and restore the
Nation's fiscal security. This policy includes ensuring
that agencies consider the costs of their
administrative actions, take steps to offset those
costs, and curtail costly administrative actions.

Sec. 3. Definitions. For the purposes of this order:

    (a) the term “discretionary administrative
action” means any administrative action that is not
required by statute and that would impact mandatory
spending, including, but not limited to, the issuance
of any agency rule, demonstration, program notice, or
guidance; and
    (b) the term “increase” in the context of
mandatory spending means an increase relative to the
projection in the most recent President's Budget, as
described in 31 U.S.C. 1105, or Mid-Session Review, as
described in 31 U.S.C. 1106, of what is required, under
current law, to fund the mandatory-spending program.

Sec. 4. Scope. This order applies to discretionary
administrative actions undertaken by agencies. If an
agency determines that a proposed administrative action
that would increase mandatory spending is required by
statute and therefore is not a discretionary
administrative action, the agency's general counsel
shall provide a written opinion to the Director of OMB
(Director) explaining that legal conclusion, and the
agency shall consult with OMB prior to taking further
action.

Sec. 5. Agency Proposal Requirements. (a) Before an
agency may undertake any discretionary administrative
action, the head of the agency shall submit the
proposed discretionary administrative action to the
Director for review. Such submission shall include an
estimate of the budgetary effects of such action.

    (b) If an agency's proposed discretionary
administrative action would increase mandatory
spending, the agency head's submission under subsection
(a) of this section shall include a proposal to
undertake other administrative action(s) that would
comparably reduce mandatory spending. Submissions to
increase mandatory spending that do not include a
proposal to offset such increased spending shall be
returned to the agency for reconsideration.

The Director shall have the discretion to determine
whether a proposed offset in mandatory spending is
comparable to the relevant increase in mandatory
spending, taking into account the magnitude of the
offset and the increase and any other factors the
Director deems appropriate.

Sec. 6. Issuance of Administrative PAYGO Guidance and
Revocation of OMB PAYGO Memorandum. Within 90 days of
the date of this order, the Director shall issue
instructions regarding the implementation of this
order, including how agency administrative action
proposals that increase mandatory spending and non-tax
receipts will be evaluated. In addition, within 90 days
of the date of this order, the Director shall revoke
OMB Memorandum M-05-13.

Sec. 7. Waiver. The Director may waive the requirements
of section 5 of this order when the Director concludes
that such a waiver is necessary for the delivery of
essential services, for effective program delivery, or
because a waiver is otherwise warranted by the public
interest.

Sec. 8. Flexibility for the Director of OMB to Pursue
Additional Deficit Reduction. The Director may pursue
additional deficit reduction through agency
administrative actions.

Sec. 9. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order
shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or
the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director relating to budgetary, administrative,
or legislative proposals.

    (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with
applicable law and subject to the availability of
appropriations.
    (c) This order is not intended to, and does not,
create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural,
enforceable at law or in equity by any party against
the United States, its departments, agencies, or
entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any
other person.

    (Presidential Sig.)

THE WHITE HOUSE,

    October 10, 2019.

Reproduced from the Federal Register plain-text record, signed October 10, 2019. Typesetting artifacts are removed; no wording is changed.