Skip to the record
The Executive Record

Not legal advice

The registerExecutive Order 13807
E.O.13807

Establishing Discipline and Accountability in the Environmental Review and Permitting Process for Infrastructure Projects

Signed August 15, 2017·Donald Trump·82 FR 40463

Source

Everything on this page is drawn from the Federal Register, the official daily journal of the United States government. Where this page and the source disagree, the source governs.

Plain-language summary

Auto-generated summaryWritten by claude-sonnet-5 from the order’s own text · prompt v4 ·

Directs federal agencies to coordinate and speed up environmental review and permitting decisions for major infrastructure projects, with a goal of completing federal reviews within about two years. Requires the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council, to set a Cross-Agency Priority Goal on infrastructure permitting within 180 days and to create a performance-tracking and scoring system for agencies, including possible penalties for missed deadlines. Establishes a 'One Federal Decision' process requiring a single lead agency, one consolidated Record of Decision, and completion of related authorizations within 90 days of that decision. Directs the Council on Environmental Quality to propose regulatory and procedural changes to streamline reviews within 30 days and to mediate interagency disputes. Expands which projects qualify as high priority under Executive Order 13766, assigns the Interior and Agriculture Departments to lead on energy corridor designations, and directs Interior to recommend related agency reorganization. Revokes Executive Order 13690 on federal flood risk management standards.

Not written or reviewed by a person. Read the full order below for anything you intend to rely on.

Report a problem with this summary
What is wrong with it?
Goes to the site’s maintainers. Not published.

Not yet published. Court challenges, injunctions and rulings tied to individual orders will appear here once each can be linked to its source record.

Nothing appears in this space without a citation to a court action or a cited precedent. An order with no such record is described as untested, never as likely or unlikely to survive.

Claimed authority

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to ensure that the Federal environmental review and permitting process for infrastructure projects is coordinated, predictable, and transparent, it is hereby ordered

Quoted from the order as written. Many orders cite nothing more specific than “the Constitution and the laws”; this reproduces what the order claims, not an assessment of whether it holds.

Disposition

Revokes: EO 13690, January 30, 2015 See: EO 13766, January 24, 2017; EO 13781, March 13, 2017; EO 13817, December 20, 2017; EO 14030, May 20, 2021 Revoked by: EO 13990, January 20, 2021

Compiled after the fact by the National Archives, so recent orders often have none yet. An empty disposition means no record, not no activity.

The order, in full

Executive Order 13807 of August 15, 2017

Establishing Discipline and Accountability in the
                Environmental Review and Permitting Process for
                Infrastructure Projects

                By the authority vested in me as President by the
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of
                America, and in order to ensure that the Federal
                environmental review and permitting process for
                infrastructure projects is coordinated, predictable,
                and transparent, it is hereby ordered as follows:

                Section 1. Purpose. America needs increased
                infrastructure investment to strengthen our economy,
                enhance our competitiveness in world trade, create jobs
                and increase wages for our workers, and reduce the
                costs of goods and services for our families. The poor
                condition of America's infrastructure has been
                estimated to cost a typical American household
                thousands of dollars each year. Inefficiencies in
                current infrastructure project decisions, including
                management of environmental reviews and permit
                decisions or authorizations, have delayed
                infrastructure investments, increased project costs,
                and blocked the American people from enjoying improved
                infrastructure that would benefit our economy, society,
                and environment. More efficient and effective Federal
                infrastructure decisions can transform our economy, so
                the Federal Government, as a whole, must change the way
                it processes environmental reviews and authorization
                decisions.

                Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the Federal
                Government to:

                    (a) safeguard our communities and maintain a
                healthy environment;
                    (b) ensure that Federal authorities make informed
                decisions concerning the environmental impacts of
                infrastructure projects;
                    (c) develop infrastructure in an environmentally
                sensitive manner;
                    (d) provide transparency and accountability to the
                public regarding environmental review and authorization
                decisions;
                    (e) be good stewards of public funds, including
                those used to develop infrastructure projects, and
                avoid duplicative and wasteful processes;
                    (f) conduct environmental reviews and authorization
                processes in a coordinated, consistent, predictable,
                and timely manner in order to give public and private
                investors the confidence necessary to make funding
                decisions for new infrastructure projects;
                    (g) speak with a coordinated voice when conducting
                environmental reviews and making authorization
                decisions; and
                    (h) make timely decisions with the goal of
                completing all Federal environmental reviews and
                authorization decisions for major infrastructure
                projects within 2 years.

                Sec. 3. Definitions. The terms of this order shall be
                applied consistently with those defined under 42 U.S.C.
                4370m and implementing guidance to the maximum extent
                possible. The following definitions shall specifically
                apply:

                    (a) “Authorization” means any license, permit,
                approval, finding, determination, or other
                administrative decision issued by a Federal department
                or agency (agency) that is required or authorized under
                Federal law in

                order to site, construct, reconstruct, or commence
                operations of an infrastructure project, including any
                authorization under 42 U.S.C. 4370m(3).
                    (b) “CAP Goals” means Federal Government Priority
                Goals established by the Government Performance and
                Results Act (GPRA) Modernization Act of 2010, Public
                Law 111-352, 124 Stat. 3866, and commonly referred to
                as Cross-Agency Priority (CAP) Goals.
                    (c) “Federal Permitting Improvement Steering
                Council” or “FPISC” means the entity established
                under 42 U.S.C. 4370m-1.
                    (d) “Infrastructure project” means a project to
                develop the public and private physical assets that are
                designed to provide or support services to the general
                public in the following sectors: surface
                transportation, including roadways, bridges, railroads,
                and transit; aviation; ports, including navigational
                channels; water resources projects; energy production
                and generation, including from fossil, renewable,
                nuclear, and hydro sources; electricity transmission;
                broadband Internet; pipelines; stormwater and sewer
                infrastructure; drinking water infrastructure; and
                other sectors as may be determined by the FPISC.
                    (e) “Major infrastructure project” means an
                infrastructure project for which multiple
                authorizations by Federal agencies will be required to
                proceed with construction, the lead Federal agency has
                determined that it will prepare an environmental impact
                statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy
                Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., and the project
                sponsor has identified the reasonable availability of
                funds sufficient to complete the project.
                    (f) “Permitting timetable” means an environmental
                review and authorization schedule, or other equivalent
                schedule, for a project or group of projects that
                identifies milestones--including intermediate and final
                completion dates for action by each agency on any
                Federal environmental review or authorization required
                for a project or group of projects--that is prepared by
                the lead Federal agency in consultation with all
                cooperating and participating agencies.

                Sec. 4. Agency Performance Accountability. Federal
                agencies should follow transparent and coordinated
                processes for conducting environmental reviews and
                making authorization decisions. These processes must
                include early and open coordination among Federal,
                State, tribal, and local agencies and early engagement
                with the public. Holding Federal agencies accountable
                for their progress on implementing the policy set forth
                in section 2 of this order should, among other things,
                produce measurably better environmental outcomes with
                respect to infrastructure development.

                    (a) Performance Priority Goals.

(i) CAP Goal. A CAP Goal is a Federal tool for accelerating progress in
priority areas that require active collaboration among multiple agencies to
overcome organizational barriers and to achieve better performance than one
agency could achieve on its own. Within 180 days of the date of this order,
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in consultation
with the FPISC, shall establish a CAP Goal on Infrastructure Permitting
Modernization so that, where permitted by law:

  (A) Federal environmental reviews and authorization processes for
infrastructure projects are consistent, coordinated, and predictable; and

  (B) the time for the Federal Government's processing of environmental
reviews and authorization decisions for new major infrastructure projects
should be reduced to not more than an average of approximately 2 years,
measured from the date of the publication of a notice of intent to prepare
an environmental impact statement or other benchmark deemed appropriate by
the Director of OMB.

(ii) Agency Goals. All Federal agencies with environmental review,
authorization, or consultation responsibilities for infrastructure projects
shall modify their Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans under the

GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 to include agency performance goals related
to the completion of environmental reviews and authorizations for
infrastructure projects consistent with the new CAP Goal on Infrastructure
Permitting Modernization. The agencies shall integrate the achievement of
these performance goals into appropriate agency personnel performance
plans, such as those of the agency Chief Environmental Review and
Permitting Officers (CERPOs) or other appropriate officials, consistent
with guidance to be provided by OMB, in consultation with the Office of
Personnel Management. Progress on these goals shall be reviewed and
analyzed by agency leadership, pursuant to the GPRA Modernization Act of
2010.

                    (b) Accountability. Within 180 days of the
                establishment of the CAP Goal on Infrastructure
                Permitting Modernization, as described in subsection
                (a) of this section, or such longer period of time as
                determined by the Director of OMB, OMB, in consultation
                with the FPISC, shall issue guidance for establishing a
                performance accountability system to facilitate
                achievement of the CAP Goal.

(i) Tracking of Major Infrastructure Projects. The performance
accountability system shall track each major infrastructure project. The
performance accountability system shall include, at a minimum, assessments
of the agency's performance with respect to each of the following areas, as
applicable:

  (A) whether major infrastructure projects are processed using the “One
Federal Decision” mechanism, as described in subsection 5(b) of this
order;

  (B) whether major infrastructure projects have a permitting timetable;

  (C) whether major infrastructure projects follow an effective process
that automatically elevates instances in which permitting timetable
milestones are missed or extended, or are anticipated to be missed or
extended, to appropriate senior agency officials;

  (D) whether agencies are meeting the established milestones in the
permitting timetable;

  (E) the time it takes to complete the processing of environmental reviews
and authorizations for each major infrastructure project; and

  (F) the costs of the environmental reviews and authorizations for each
major infrastructure project.

(ii) Scoring. The accountability system shall include a scoring mechanism
that shall follow, at a minimum, the following procedures:

  (A) agencies will submit information to OMB, consistent with existing
reporting mechanisms to the maximum extent possible, on the assessment
areas described in subsection (b)(i) of this section;

  (B) at least once per quarter, OMB will produce a scorecard of agency
performance and overall progress toward achieving CAP Goal targets;

  (C) where an agency's inability to meet a permitting timetable milestone
results in a significant delay of the project timeline, after consulting
with the project sponsor and relevant agencies, agencies will submit (based
on OMB guidance) an estimate of the delay's costs to the project; and

  (D) the Director of OMB will consider each agency's performance during
budget formulation and determine whether appropriate penalties, including
those authorized at 23 U.S.C. 139(h)(7) and 33 U.S.C. 2348(h)(5), must or
should be imposed, to the extent required or permitted by law, for those
that significantly fail to meet a permitting timetable milestone or in
other situations deemed appropriate by the Director of OMB after
considering the causes of any poor performance.

(iii) Best Practices. Agencies shall implement the techniques and
strategies the FPISC annually identifies as best practices pursuant to 42
U.S.C. 4370m-1(c)(2)(B), as appropriate. The performance accountability
system

shall track and score agencies on the incorporation and implementation of
appropriate best practices for all infrastructure projects, including the
implementation of such best practices at an agency's field level.

                Sec. 5. Process Enhancements. In furtherance of the
                policy described in section 2 of this order, Federal
                agencies shall follow a more unified environmental
                review and authorization process.

                    (a) Processing of Major Infrastructure Projects. In
                processing environmental reviews and authorizations for
                major infrastructure projects, Federal agencies shall:

(i) use “One Federal Decision” described in subsection (b) of this
section;

(ii) develop and follow a permitting timetable, which shall be reviewed and
updated at least quarterly by the lead Federal agency in consultation with
Federal cooperating and participating agencies; and

(iii) follow an effective process that automatically elevates instances
where a permitting timetable milestone is missed or extended, or is
anticipated to be missed or extended, to appropriate senior agency
officials of the lead Federal agency and the cooperating and participating
Federal agency or agencies to which the milestone applies.

                    (b) One Federal Decision.

(i) Each major infrastructure project shall have a lead Federal agency,
which shall be responsible for navigating the project through the Federal
environmental review and authorization process, including the
identification of a primary Federal point of contact at each Federal
agency. All Federal cooperating and participating agencies shall identify
points of contact for each project, cooperate with the lead Federal agency
point of contact, and respond to all reasonable requests for information
from the lead Federal agency in a timely manner.

(ii) With respect to the applicability of NEPA to a major infrastructure
project, the Federal lead, cooperating, and participating agencies for each
major infrastructure project shall all record any individual agency
decision in one Record of Decision (ROD), which shall be coordinated by the
lead Federal agency unless the project sponsor requests that agencies issue
separate NEPA documents, the NEPA obligations of a cooperating or
participating agency have already been satisfied, or the lead Federal
agency determines that a single ROD would not best promote completion of
the project's environmental review and authorization process. The Federal
lead, cooperating, and participating agencies shall all agree to a
permitting timetable that includes the completion dates for the ROD and the
federally required authorizations for the project.

(iii) All Federal authorization decisions for the construction of a major
infrastructure project shall be completed within 90 days of the issuance of
a ROD by the lead Federal agency, provided that the final EIS includes an
adequate level of detail to inform agency decisions pursuant to their
specific statutory authority and requirements. The lead Federal agency may
extend the 90-day deadline if the lead Federal agency determines that
Federal law prohibits the agency from issuing its approval or permit within
the 90-day period, the project sponsor requests that the permit or approval
follow a different timeline, or the lead Federal agency determines that an
extension would better promote completion of the project's environmental
review and authorization process.

(iv) The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and OMB shall develop the
framework for implementing One Federal Decision, in consultation with the
FPISC.

  (A) The framework should be consistent with the model processes
established under 42 U.S.C. 4370m-2, 23 U.S.C. 139, 33 U.S.C. 2348, the
2015 “Red Book” (officially entitled “Synchronizing Environmental
Reviews for Transportation and Other Infrastructure Projects”), and CEQ
guidance on efficient and timely environmental reviews under NEPA.

  (B) The framework shall also include guidance on the development of
permitting timetables by the lead Federal agencies, in collaboration with
Federal cooperating and participating agencies. Permitting timetables shall
identify estimated intermediate and final completion dates for all
environmental reviews and authorizations that are reasonably anticipated as
being needed for a project, including the process for granting extensions
of any established dates. The guidance shall specify that lead Federal
agencies need not include the estimated intermediate and final completion
dates of any such reviews or authorizations until the design of a project
has sufficiently advanced so that they can be developed. In such cases, the
guidance shall instruct lead Federal agencies to estimate when the
project's design will be advanced enough to determine such dates. The
timelines shall account for any federally required decisions or permits
that are assumed by, or delegated to, State, tribal, or local agencies and
the extent to which any approval or permit to be issued by a Federal agency
is dependent upon the issuance of such a decision or permit.

  (C) CEQ and OMB shall also develop guidance for applying One Federal
Decision whenever the lead agency is a State, tribal, or local agency
exercising an assignment or delegation of an agency's NEPA
responsibilities.

                    (c) Dashboard. All projects subject to 23 U.S.C.
                139 and “covered projects” under 42 U.S.C. 4370m
                shall be tracked on the Dashboard established under 42
                U.S.C. 4370m-2(b). Other projects or classes of
                projects subject to special environmental review and
                authorization streamlining processes similar to those
                referenced in this subsection may also be tracked on
                the Dashboard at the discretion of the FPISC Executive
                Director. The dates for milestones of all projects
                tracked on the Dashboard shall be updated monthly, or
                on another appropriate timeline as may be determined by
                the FPISC Executive Director.
                    (d) Executive Order 13766. For purposes of
                implementing Executive Order 13766 of January 24, 2017
                (Expediting Environmental Reviews and Approvals for
                High Priority Infrastructure Projects), all
                infrastructure projects that meet the criteria for, and
                are subject to, 23 U.S.C. 139, 33 U.S.C. 2348, or 42
                U.S.C. 4370m-4370m-12 shall qualify as high priority
                projects under Executive Order 13766. Other projects or
                classes of projects subject to special environmental
                review and authorization streamlining processes,
                similar to those referenced in this subsection as may
                be determined by the FPISC Executive Director in
                consultation with OMB and CEQ, shall also qualify as
                high priority infrastructure projects under Executive
                Order 13766. The CEQ Chairman's responsibilities under
                sections 2 and 3 of Executive Order 13766 shall be
                satisfied by referring the project to the FPISC
                Executive Director, the Secretary of Transportation, or
                the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, as
                appropriate.
                    (e) Council on Environmental Quality.

(i) Directives. Within 30 days of the date of this order, the CEQ shall
develop an initial list of actions it will take to enhance and modernize
the Federal environmental review and authorization process. Such actions
should include issuing such regulations, guidance, and directives as CEQ
may deem necessary to:

  (A) ensure optimal interagency coordination of environmental review and
authorization decisions, including by providing for an expanded role and
authorities for lead agencies, more clearly defined responsibilities for
cooperating and participating agencies, and Government-wide applicability
of NEPA decisions and analyses;

  (B) ensure that environmental reviews and authorization decisions
involving multiple agencies are conducted in a manner that is concurrent,
synchronized, timely, and efficient;

  (C) provide for agency use, to the maximum extent permitted by law, of
environmental studies, analysis, and decisions conducted in support

of earlier Federal, State, tribal, or local environmental reviews or
authorization decisions; and

  (D) ensure that agencies apply NEPA in a manner that reduces unnecessary
burdens and delays as much as possible, including by using CEQ's authority
to interpret NEPA to simplify and accelerate the NEPA review process.

(ii) Dispute Resolution. Except where dispute resolution processes are
otherwise provided for in law, including under 42 U.S.C. 4370m-2, or by
Executive Order or other Presidential directive, upon request of a lead
Federal agency, cooperating agency, or participating agency, CEQ may
mediate interagency disputes arising between Federal agencies concerning
Federal environmental review or authorization decisions for any
infrastructure project pertaining to any environmental law, regulation,
order or policy, and shall facilitate resolution of any conflicting
positions of the relevant agencies.

(iii) Agency Procedures. CEQ shall form and lead an interagency working
group, consisting of the Director of OMB, agency CERPOs, and such other
representatives of agencies as CEQ deems appropriate. The working group
shall review the NEPA implementing regulations and other environmental
review and authorization processing policies of agencies that are members
of the FPISC to identify impediments to efficient and effective
environmental reviews and authorizations for infrastructure projects. The
working group shall also identify those agencies that require an action
plan to address identified impediments. Based on this review, agencies
shall develop action plans that set forth the actions they will take and
timelines for completing those actions, and they shall submit those action
plans to CEQ and OMB for comment. Each agency's action plan shall, at a
minimum, establish procedures for a regular review and update of
categorical exclusions, where appropriate.

                    (f) Federal Permitting Improvement Steering
                Council.

(i) Organizational Support. Unless otherwise determined by the Director of
OMB, the General Services Administration (GSA) shall provide necessary
administrative and organizational support to the FPISC, including
personnel, procurement, and budget support. The GSA Administrator, or the
head of another agency designated by the Director of OMB, may delegate any
authority to the FPISC Executive Director necessary for the operation and
administration of the FPISC and the Office of the Executive Director, and
the Executive Director may redelegate these authorities, as appropriate.

(ii) Additional Duties. In addition to the duties and responsibilities
charged to the FPISC Executive Director under 42 U.S.C. 4370m-4370m-12 and
this order, the FPISC Executive Director may, upon request of a FPISC
member agency or a project sponsor, work with the lead agency or any
cooperating and participating agencies to facilitate the environmental
review and authorization process for any infrastructure project regardless
of whether the project is a “covered project” under 42 U.S.C. 4370m,
including by resolving disputes and promoting early coordination. The FPISC
Executive Director, the Director of OMB, or the Chairman of CEQ may
establish any appropriate policies or procedures concerning the FPISC
Executive Director's facilitation of the environmental review and
authorization process under this subsection. Agencies must cooperate with
the FPISC Executive Director with respect to the implementation of these
additional duties.

                    (g) Energy Corridors. The Departments of the
                Interior and Agriculture, as appropriate, shall be the
                lead agencies for facilitating the identification and
                designation of energy right-of-way corridors on Federal
                lands for Government-wide expedited environmental
                review for the development of energy infrastructure
                projects.
                    (h) The Department of the Interior shall provide to
                OMB a strategy and recommendations for a multi-agency
                reorganization effort that would further

                the aims of this order. OMB, in consultation with the
                Department of the Interior, shall coordinate with the
                heads of other agencies affected to incorporate the
                strategy, as appropriate, into the comprehensive
                reorganization plan developed under Executive Order
                13781 of March 13, 2017 (Comprehensive Plan for
                Reorganizing the Executive Branch).

                Sec. 6. Executive Order 13690 of January 30, 2015
                (Establishing a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard
                and a Process for Further Soliciting and Considering
                Stakeholder Input), is revoked.

                Sec. 7. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order
                shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the
head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget
relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

                    (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with
                applicable law and subject to the availability of
                appropriations.
                    (c) This order is not intended to, and does not,
                create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural,
                enforceable at law or in equity by any party against
                the United States, its departments, agencies, or
                entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any
                other person.

                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    August 15, 2017.

Reproduced from the Federal Register plain-text record, signed August 15, 2017. Typesetting artifacts are removed; no wording is changed.